Employers are responsible for ensuring the safety of their employees both at work and when working from home. WorkSafeBC recommends that every employer have a health and safety policy for working from home to help ensure their workspace is healthy and safe.
The policy should address the following:
Employers should communicate regularly and educate employees on health and safety matters, as well as check in on their mental health especially for employees working alone or in isolation.
Note to our Readers: This is not legal advice. If you are looking for legal advice in relation to a particular matter, please contact our Employment & Labour Group.
For more FAQ by employers regarding current covid restrictions, holidays, and employee vaccinations please visit link below.
Follow Office Break News on LinkedIn!
Become a part of our community
More To Read
This has been a hot topic since the news of the first-approved vaccine. Currently in British Columbia there is no specific legislation requiring employees to get vaccinated. However, please note that this could evolve once the vaccine is underway and available to the public at large.
The short answer to this question is yes, generally non-unionized employers (and in some cases unionized employers) can require employees to get the vaccine (with certain exceptions discussed below). BC Employers have an obligation to ensure the health and safety of all workers in the office or on the jobsite under section 21 of the Workers Compensation Act. WorkSafeBC Policy Item P2-21-1 provides further context on the scope of this duty:
Section 21(1)(a)(ii) reflects that purpose and ultimately requires an employer to ask “Have I done all that I can reasonably do to ensure the health and safety of those other workers?”
Nature of Workplace
Each employer will have to assess its specific workplace and make a fundamental decision as to whether it needs all employees to receive the vaccine or provide a vaccination certificate to make the workplace safer. There may be workplaces where social distancing, wearing masks and washing hands may be determined to be sufficient protection for all or certain departments or areas of the workplace. In some cases outside factors may require vaccination, such as an individual who is required to travel frequently for his/her job, where the individual works in the health care sector or with vulnerable individuals, and where it would be a reasonable expectation the individual maintains the proper vaccinations (including COVID-19). These are considerations for the employer – requiring all employees to receive the vaccine is a fundamental issue that can be controversial and lead to legal action against the employer.
Employers can also consider requiring different work conditions for employees depending on whether or not they have been vaccinated. For example, employees who have not been vaccinated may be required to continue to work remotely, or to continue to complete COVID-19 daily assessments before entering the workplace, maintain distance and wear a mask at the workplace.
Covid-19 Vaccination Refusals and Terminations
Employers can’t physically force employees to get the vaccine, but they can make the COVID-19 vaccination a condition of continued employment. Depending on the nature of the employment and the risk associated with it, certain employers have a stronger case for making the COVID-19 vaccination a condition of employment (e.g hospitals, medical clinics, long-term care, group homes, retail, service industry).
The more interesting question becomes whether an employer can terminate an employee who refuses to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The answer to this is: it depends on the reason for the refusal. If the reason involves a protected ground under the BC Human Rights Code, such as a physical (medical) disability or religious grounds, then the employee may have a human rights claim against an employer who terminates on the basis of the protected ground. However, if the reason is mere personal preference that is unrelated to a protected characteristic, then the employer can terminate an employee, provided they offer the appropriate notice or severance pay mandated by the employee’s written employment contract or in the absence of a written contract, the common law. In the case of unionized workplaces, the employer should pay special attention to the collective agreement in place and seek advice from an experienced labour lawyer prior to terminating or disciplining an employee. Mike Weiler is our labour expert at KSW Lawyers, with over 37 years of experience in labour law (email@example.com).
Examples of protected grounds for refusing to take the vaccine may include:
Mandatory vaccination is not without precedent in Canada. Some examples of mandatory vaccinations (or mask) policies include public school settings for some provinces and healthcare settings involving mandatory vaccination policies or “vaccine or mask” policies in relation to seasonal influenza. BC has had an influenza prevention policy in place since 2012. The policy requires all healthcare workers to be vaccinated against influenza or wear a mask in patient care areas throughout the influenza season. The policy also applies to visitors, volunteers and students who attend a patient care area.
In an Ontario case Barkley v Mohawk Council, 2000 CarswellNat 3877, a nurse working as a non-unionized employee on a fixed term contract at a federally regulated adult care facility refused to comply with the facility’s mandatory influenza immunization policy on the basis she had never been sick with the flu and had faith in her immune system (reasons not protected by human rights legislation). The employer described the immunizations as a condition of continued employment, and anyone who refused to get the vaccination would be dismissed. At the hearing, the employer led evidence about the risks the flu posed to residents with whom the employee had frequent contact. The Arbitrator ruled that there was a legitimate interest on the part of the employer in the residents’ wellbeing and health. The decision to impose vaccination was therefore not unreasonable and the termination of the employee’s employment was upheld. While this case dealt with the unjust dismissal provisions of the Canada Labour Code, its principle may be applied in provincial cases.
Privacy, COVID-19 Vaccine Policy and Recommendations
Employers should keep in mind that even asking an employee whether they have had the vaccination and requesting proof of vaccination or a vaccination certificate is a collection of personal information/personal health information triggering privacy considerations. Any employer should be mindful of the privacy legislation that applies to them. We also recommend keeping a close eye on the vaccination system that Canada and British Columbia will engage and on balancing the privacy rights of Canadians and public safety during a pandemic.
The employer’s obligation to ensure the health, safety and welfare of its workers must be balanced with the employee’s right to privacy. As previously mentioned, employers should evaluate whether implementing a vaccine verification program is integral to providing a safe workplace and ensure that such a program does not unreasonably infringe on an employee’s privacy expectations.
Once an employer has made a decision, the employer should consider developing a policy on COVID-19 vaccinations. The policy should contain the following: authority for collection, statement of purpose, statement whether vaccination certificate will be required, statement on possible actions taken based on whether employee is vaccinated or not, statement on storage, sharing and destruction of the information. Our team can assist employers with developing policies.
Some best practices to keep in mind when developing and implementing a vaccine verification program include:
Takeaways for Employers
Note to Readers: This is not legal advice. If you are looking for legal advice in relation to a particular matter or drafting of workplace vaccination policy, please contact Chris Drinovz at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Author: Chris Drinovz
Chris Drinovz is an experienced employment and labour lawyer in Abbotsford, Langley, Surrey & South Surrey and Head of the Employment & Labour Group at KSW Lawyers (Kane Shannon Weiler LLP). Chris has been assisting local businesses with workplace issues since 2010. His expertise covers all facets of the workplace including wrongful dismissal, employment contracts, workplace policies, and WorkSafeBC matters, including occupational health & safety. Chris is on the Executive of the Employment Law Section of the Canadian Bar Association BC, and a Director for Surrey Cares and Greater Langley Chamber of Commerce.
Become a part of our LinkedIn community!